Legal Opinion

Hubenette v. Ostby

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 4, 1942No. 33,271PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gallagher, Chief Justice.

Two causes of action, one by plaintiff in his own behalf and one in behalf of his minor son, Merlin, for damages arising out of a collision between an automobile owned and operated by defendant Ostby and one owned and operated by defendant Myhres, resulted in verdicts for plaintiffs. Myhres interposed answers but thereafter made no appearance personally or by counsel. Ostby, to whom we shall hereinafter refer as defendant, appeals from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment or a new trial in the action here involved. There is no appeal in the son’s case.

T…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mosheuvel v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Rase v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  3. Wright v. City of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Herdman v. ZwartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  5. Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. McHaleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Springrose v. WillmoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. Johnson v. EvanskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. Schrader v. KrieselSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Wilson v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. Mayzlik v. Lansing Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API