Legal Opinion
Marculescu v. City Planning Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 4, 1935No. Civ. 9504PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, J., pro tem.
Respondents’ property in the city and county of San Francisco was, upon their application, rezoned by the City Planning Commission from a residential to a commercial classification. The board of supervisors, upon an appeal of other property owners, sustained such reclassification. Adjacent property owners then filed with the commission a petition requesting that respondents’ property be rezoned to a residential classification. After a trial in proceedings initiated by respondents, the superior court issued a writ of prohibition permanently restraining the commission from…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- In Re PfahlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- City of San Francisco v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Morrison v. LandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Elliott v. Superior Court of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1914
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Adams v. WolffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Davis v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Monterey Club v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Brown v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Cow Hollow Improvement Club v. Board of Permit AppealsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.