Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Superior Court of Cal.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1914No. L.A. No. 3949PublishedCited by 59 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Prohibition to he directed against the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, and S. F. Kelley. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The petitioner has applied to this court for a writ of prohibition to arrest proceedings in a certain action pending in the superior court of San Bernardino County, wherein a receiver was appointed. The action, an ordinary one at law, entitled, "The Brookings Timber Lumber Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. The Gibraltar Investment and Home Building Company, a corporation, defendant," was brought to recover $876.56, alleged to be due from the defendant to plaintiff for goods sold and delivered. Hereinafter the plaintiff in the action will be referred to as the Brookings Company and the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. La Société Française D'Epargnes et de Prévoyance Mutuelle v. Dist. Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Dist.California Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Gilde v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Neall v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  5. White v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Clark v. WilliardSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Check v. KaplanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Evans v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Timberidge Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. A. G. Col Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API