Legal Opinion

Hines v. Driver

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 10,644PublishedCited by 23 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

At the November term, 1881, of the court below, in an action on a promissory note, in which James F. Driver, the appellee, was plaintiff, and William Hines, Jr., and William Hines, Sr., the appellants, were defendants. There was a verdict and judgment against the plaintiff, in favor of the defendant William Hines, Jr., upon a counter-claim filed by him, for the sum of $160.

On the 24th day of August, 1882, the appellee filed in the Hamilton Circuit Court a complaint, setting out the proceedings which resulted in the verdict and judgment against him as above, and demanding a new trial of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Houston v. BrunerIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Sanders v. LoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Belt v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1850
  4. Glidewell v. DaggyIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  5. McCall v. HitchcockCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1870

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hines v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Board of Commissioners v. AllmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Morrison v. CareyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Paul v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Lowry v. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1920

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API