Legal Opinion
Swann v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 10, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2012-1320PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Audrey Swann’s career as an electrician in the House Office Buildings was short-circuited in 2012 when she was terminated by her employer — the Office of the Architect of the Capitol (“OAC”)— based on an Inspector General report that concluded she had falsified her employment application. Swann responded with two lawsuits against the OAC for gender discrimination and retaliation. In this, the first of the two, she alleges that the OAC discriminated and retaliated against her for having filed two prior…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Walden v. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Inst.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Uzoukwu v. Metropolitan Washington Council of GovernmentsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Redding v. MattisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Jeffries v. LynchDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Swann v. Office of the Architect of the CapitolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.