Legal Opinion
Swann v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 10, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2013-1076PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge
After receiving an anonymous tip, the Inspector General of the Office of the Architect of the Capitol (“AOC”) conducted an investigation into whether Audrey Swann, an AOC electrician, had misrepresented her education and experience levels when she initially applied for her position. The investigation concluded that Ms. Swann had in fact overstated her qualifications in her* employment application. Upon receiving the Inspector General’s report and Swann’s response, the Architect of the Capitol terminated her on the basis of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Njang v. Whitestone Group, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Saunders v. McMahonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Dodson v. United States Capitol PoliceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Jimenez v. DukeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019