Legal Opinion
Walden v. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Inst.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 30, 2018No. Civil Action No. 15–1034 (TJK)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TIMOTHY J. KELLY, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Apprill Walden alleges that her former employer, Defendant Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute ("PCORI"), violated the District of Columbia Human Rights Act ("DCHRA"), D.C. Code § 2-1401.01 et seq. , by discriminating against her on the basis of her disability and retaliating against her after she requested accommodations for that disability, a protected activity under the statute. ECF No. 1 ("Compl."); ECF No. 26 ("Opp."). PCORI denies these allegations and moves for summary judgment. ECF No. 23 ("Mot."). For the reasons set…
2Cases cited81 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Tyes-Williams v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Albert v. PerdueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Best v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Coakley-Simelton v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Dougherty v. Cable News NetworkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.