Legal Opinion

Hakim v. Accenture United States Pension Plan

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 16, 2010No. Case 08-cv-3682PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ROBERT M. DOW, JR., District Judge.

Currently before the Court are Defendants’ motion for summary judgment [72] and Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on Count IVL87]. 1 For the rea sons stated below, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment [72] is granted in part and denied in part, and Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on Count IV[87] is denied.

I. Background

A. Procedural Background

Plaintiff filed this putative class action against Accenture United States Pension Plan (the “Plan”), Accenture LLP, Accenture Inc., Accenture LLC, and Accenture…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Lionel Bordelon v. Chicago School Reform Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Costello v. Beavex Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
  2. Hakim v. Accenture United States Pension PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  3. Leeper v. Alliance Res. Partners, L.P.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. Charly Acquisitions, Ltd v. 43 North Broadway, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
  5. Hoffman v. Sara Lee Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API