Legal Opinion
Schultz v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 11, 2010No. 09 C 2387PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RUBEN CASTILLO, District Judge.
Kathleen G. Schultz (“Schultz”) brings this putative class action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. and various state laws. Schultz seeks to recover long-term disability (“LTD”) benefits under the Long Term Disability Plan by Aviall, Inc. (the “Aviall Plan”), which was maintained by her former employer, Aviall, Inc. (“Aviall”) and issued by the Prudential Insurance Company of America (“Prudential”). (R. 27, Am. Compl.) In her complaint, she also seeks recovery on behalf of…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Holmes v. GodinezDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- JACOBS, JR. v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- Schatzel v. Central States Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension FundDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Schultz v. Aviall, Inc. Long Term Disability PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Ayotte v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.