Legal Opinion
Paul Satterfield v. Philip L. Johnson the District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 17, 2006No. 04-3108PublishedCited by 140 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
RESTANI, Judge.
This appeal arises out of a petition for post-conviction review of a state-court con viction for first-degree murder and possession of an instrument of crime entered against Paul Satterfield in 1985. Appellee, Satterfield, was granted a writ of habeas corpus by Judge Jan E. DuBois of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel arising from trial counsel’s failure to call potentially exculpatory eye-witnesses at trial. Appellants Philip L. Johnson, the District Attorney for Philadelphia County, and the Attorney…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Artuz v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Carey v. SaffoldSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Commonwealth v. FahySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by140 opinions
- Joseph Nara v. Frederick FrankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Robert Jenkins v. Superintendent Laurel HighlandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Sweet v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Urcinoli v. CathelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Paul Satterfield v. District Attorney PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.