Legal Opinion

Paul Satterfield v. District Attorney Philadelphia

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 26, 2017No. 15-2190PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

VANASKIE, Circuit Judge.

Society views the conviction of an innocent person as perhaps the most grievous mistake our judicial system can commit. Reflecting the gravity of such an affront to liberty, the “fundamental miscarriage of justice” exception has evolved to allow ha-beas corpus petitioners to litigate their constitutional claims despite certain procedural bars if the petitioner can make a credible showing of actual innocence. In 2013, the Supreme Court’s decision in McQuiggin v. Perkins, 569 U.S. 383, 133 S.Ct. 1924, 185 L.Ed.2d 1019 (2013), extended this doctrine to…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Jerry Reeves v. Superintendent Fayette SCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  2. William Bracey v. Superintendent Rockview SCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
  3. Michael Bynoe v. Isidro BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. Gerald Howell v. Superintendent Albion SCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  5. Alan Ross v. Bennett MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API