Legal Opinion
Pace v. DiGuglielmo
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 27, 2005No. 03-9627PublishedCited by 4,424 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist
The federal Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) establishes a 1-year statute of limitations for filing a federal habeas corpus petition. 28 U. S. C. § 2244(d)(1). That limitations period is tolled, however, while “a properly filed application for State post-conviction or other collateral review with respect to the pertinent judgment or claim is pending.” § 2244(d)(2). This case requires us to decide whether a state postconviction petition rejected by the state court as untimely nonetheless is “properly filed” within the meaning of § 2244(d)(2). We conclude that it is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Artuz v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Pliler v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Carey v. SaffoldSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Commonwealth v. FahySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4,424 opinions
- Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Lawrence v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Yang v. ArchuletaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Keitt v. New York CityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
4,419 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.