Legal Opinion
Artuz v. Bennett
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 7, 2000No. 99-1238PublishedCited by 1,340 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia
Section 2244(d)(2) of Title 28 U. S. C. (1994 ed., Supp. IV) provides that “[tjhe time during which a properly filed application for State post-conviction or other collateral review with respect to the pertinent judgment or claim is pending shall not be counted toward any period of limitation under this subsection.” This case presents the question whether an application for state postconviction relief containing claims that are procedurally barred is “properly filed” within the meaning of this provision.
I
After a 1984 jury trial in the Supreme Court of New York, Queens County, respondent was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Martin v. District of Columbia Court of AppealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. LombardoSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,340 opinions
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Rodosvaldo Pozo v. Gary McCaughtry Randall Gerritson, and David HautamakiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Clay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Magwood v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
1,335 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.