Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Fahy

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 27, 1999PublishedCited by 923 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAPPY, Justice.

This is a direct appeal 1 from the order of the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas which denied Appellant Henry Fahy’s request for relief pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”). 2 For the reasons that follow, we affirm the order of the PCRA court dismissing Appellant’s fourth petition for collateral relief.

Sixteen years ago, in 1983, a jury convicted Appellant of murder in the first degree, rape, burglary, and possession of an instrument of crime. These convictions arose from the brutal murder and rape of 12-year old Nicoletta “Nicky” Caserta. The jury found…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Michael Kapral v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  4. Donald Burns v. Willis E. Morton, Superintendent Peter Verniero, the Attorney General of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. PeterkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by923 opinions

  1. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Commonwealth v. CarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Commonwealth v. Gamboa-TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

918 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API