Legal Opinion

Slotemaker v. International Fruit & Produce Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1930No. 22227. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomr, J.

Respondent brought action and got judgment in the lower court against a commission merchant, doing business under the corporate style of International Fruit & Produce Co., and Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, a corporation, its surety, or guarantor, for a balance of $652.48 for fruit and produce shipped to the commission merchant to be sold by it on a commission basis and for which it had not accounted, and $100 attorney’s fees.

The complaint alleges the corporate existence of the International Fruit & Produce Co. and that it was doing business as a licensed commission merchant in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PoetkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. State Ex Rel. Urton v. American Bank & Trust Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Russell v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Bissell v. DurfeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Dunn v. BaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gruen v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Decano v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Sills v. SchneiderWashington Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API