Slotemaker v. International Fruit & Produce Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomr, J.
Respondent brought action and got judgment in the lower court against a commission merchant, doing business under the corporate style of International Fruit & Produce Co., and Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, a corporation, its surety, or guarantor, for a balance of $652.48 for fruit and produce shipped to the commission merchant to be sold by it on a commission basis and for which it had not accounted, and $100 attorney’s fees.
The complaint alleges the corporate existence of the International Fruit & Produce Co. and that it was doing business as a licensed commission merchant in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PoetkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- State Ex Rel. Urton v. American Bank & Trust Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1926
- Russell v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1908
- Bissell v. DurfeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Dunn v. BaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gruen v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Decano v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Sills v. SchneiderWashington Supreme Court · 1939