Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Urton v. American Bank & Trust Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1926No. 5,822PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

During all the time involved in this controversy, our depositary law required every county treasurer to deposit public funds in his possession or under his control in banks in the county designated by the board of county commissioners. It provided that the deposits should draw interest and should be secured by such surety bonds, personal bonds, or public securities, warrants, etc., as the board of county commissioners might prescribe, approve and deem sufficient for the purpose intended. (See. 4767, Rev. Codes 1921, as amended by Chap. 89, Laws of 1923.)

Early in 1923, the American Bank &…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Stadler v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Wheeler & Motter Merc. Co. v. MoonMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Franklin Bank v. CooperSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1853
  5. Dover Lumber Co. v. WhitcombMontana Supreme Court · 1917

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ex Parte OldenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
  2. Ex parte HaleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. State Ex Rel. Matson v. O'HernMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Campbell v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Day v. School District No. 21Montana Supreme Court · 1934

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API