Legal Opinion
Sills v. Schneider
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 7, 1939No. 27214. En BancPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.
These actions arise out of a collision be-
tween an automobile in which plaintiffs were riding and a taxicab owned by defendant Schneider and driven by defendant Schaefer. The Maryland Casualty Company, having, pursuant to Rem. Rev. Stat., Vol. 7A, § 6383 [P. C. § 236], issued a public liability insurance policy upon the taxicab, was made a party defendant. Rem. Rev. Stat., Vol. 7A, § 6384 [P. C. § 237].
The cause was tried to the court, which found that the collision was due to negligence on the part of the driver of the taxicab. Judgments were entered against all of the defendants. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Detroit Ex Rel. Watson v. Blue Ribbon Auto Drivers' Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Slotemaker v. International Fruit & Produce Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by4 opinions
- Drake v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Miller v. State Automobile Insurance Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
- Trinity Universal Ins. v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Drake v. PENNSYLVANIA THRESHER. & F. MUT. CAS. INS. CO.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1957