Legal Opinion

Russell v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Ry. Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1908No. 2,511PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Lewis and Clark County; Thos„ C. Bach, Judge. Action by Edward C. Russell against the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals-

1Opinion of the Court · SmithJustice Smith

The complaint in this action reads as follows: “Plaintiff complains of the defendant, and alleges:

‘ ‘ (1) That the defendant is a corporation organized and doing business under the laws of the state of Illinois, and doing business in the states of Montana, Wyoming, South Dakota and Nebraska.

“(2) That the said defendant corporation is the owner of and maintains and operates a railroad, as a common carrier, from the city of Billings, in the state of Montana, to the city of Omaha, in the state of Nebraska.
“ (3) That on the twenty-fifth day of October, 1905, and until the third or fourth day of…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Brantlt.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. State v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Pierse v. MilesMontana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. King v. Pony Gold Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Yegen v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bonner v. DixonMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. State v. DriscollMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  3. City of Billings v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State Ex Rel. Urton v. American Bank & Trust Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Alexander v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API