Legal Opinion
Dunn v. Bailey
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 25, 1927No. 20116. Department OnePublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
On July 9, 1924, C. M. Dunn with his wife and Charles W. McClain, a guest, riding in an automobile driven by Dunn, suffered injuries in a collision át a street intersection, in the city of Seattle, with a for-hire car, owned and operated by Gr. S. Bailey and H. H. Bailey, doing business as the DeLuxe Cab Company, driven by Lester Grove, an employee of the cab company. McClain and wife instituted an action to recover damages against the Baileys and the Mutual Union Insurance Company, the surety upon the bond required under ch. 57, Laws of 1915, p. 227 (Rem. Comp. Stat., §6382 et seq) [P. C.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- LaRose v. Logansport National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Bostwick v. . Van VoorhisNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Mattoon v. . YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Reilly v. . DodgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Andrus v. BeallsNew York Supreme Court · 1824
3Cited by3 opinions
- Boulter v. Commercial Standard Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Slotemaker v. International Fruit & Produce Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
- Birmingham Fire Insurance Com Pany of Pennsylvania, a Corporation v. Lee Semon, Jr., and Miriam Semon, Husband and WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971