Legal Opinion

Larkin v. Mullen

California Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1900No. Sac. No. 604PublishedCited by 19 opinions

In addition to the averments of the complaint set forth in the opinion, the complaint averred that the value of the property owned by him and described in the complaint, and which he was induced to convey to the defendant, Anna H. Mullen, was at the time of the conveyance, and is now, about five thousand dollars; that plaintiff is an old man, sixty-five years of age; that in the month of May, 1895, while residing at the home of the defendants, plaintiff, being alarmed at his…

Read the full summary

In addition to the averments of the complaint set forth in the opinion, the complaint averred that the value of the property owned by him and described in the complaint, and which he was induced to convey to the defendant, Anna H. Mullen, was at the time of the conveyance, and is now, about five thousand dollars; that plaintiff is an old man, sixty-five years of age; that in the month of May, 1895, while residing at the home of the defendants, plaintiff, being alarmed at his condition of health, decided to go to San Francisco for medical treatment, and that the defendant Mrs. Anna Mullen…

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The defendants appeal from a judgment directing them to deliver up a certain deed executed by plaintiff, to the defendant, Mrs. Mullen, the wife of the other defendant; that said deed be canceled, and that defendants reconvey to plaintiff the premises described therein. A demurrer to the complaint was overruled by the superior court, and, upon the issues presented by the answer of the defendants, the cause was tried by the court, and findings made supporting the averments of the complaint. Judgment was thereupon entered in favor of the plaintiff. The appeal is brought here upon the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Place v. . MinsterNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Amestoy v. Elec. Rapid Transit Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Mullally v. TownsendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Harnish v. BramerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Bliss v. SneathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Parkside Realty Co. v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Volk v. VolkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Ryan v. Oakland Gas, Light & Heat Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
  4. Mode, Ltd. v. MyersIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Anderson v. Bank of Lassen CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API