Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Oakland Gas, Light & Heat Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 13, 1913No. Civ. No. 999PublishedCited by 20 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County and from an order denying a new trial. Wm. H. Waste, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

The complaint in this case was filed in December, 1904, and was brought to issue by answer in October, 1905. On appeal from the judgment at the first trial it was held that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict in favor of plaintiff but the judgment was reversed because of an instruction which, in the opinion of the appellate court, took from the jury a question of fact. Ryan v. Oakland Gas etc. Co., 10 Cal. App. 484, [102 Pac. 558],)

Respondent contends that, so far as the facts are concerned, the decision on the first appeal is the law of the case, inasmuch as the evidence is…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Los Angeles Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Callan v. BullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Tedford v. Los Angeles Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Melone v. Sierra Ry. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Cushing v. PiresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. May v. FarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Dougherty v. EllingsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Rystinki v. Central California Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Davis v. RentonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Sommer v. GaborCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API