Amestoy v. Elec. Rapid Transit Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated, in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
This appeal is from a judgment entered upon demurrer.
From the complaint, it appears that plaintiff owns a lot in the city of Los Angeles, on the west side Los Angeles Street, fronting 83.07 feet on that street. In 1886, the city granted to certain named parties a franchise for a street-railroad, extending through Los Angeles and other streets. The road was only partly constructed, and of course was operated only for a portion of the distance for which the franchise was granted. The franchise was granted upon consideration that the grantees would pave and keep in repair the street…
2Cited by32 opinions
- Clements v. T. R. Bechtel Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Campbell v. GenshleaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Alexander v. McDowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Mullally v. TownsendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Hunt v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.