Legal Opinion

Amestoy v. Elec. Rapid Transit Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1892No. 14695PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated, in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Temple, C.

This appeal is from a judgment entered upon demurrer.

From the complaint, it appears that plaintiff owns a lot in the city of Los Angeles, on the west side Los Angeles Street, fronting 83.07 feet on that street. In 1886, the city granted to certain named parties a franchise for a street-railroad, extending through Los Angeles and other streets. The road was only partly constructed, and of course was operated only for a portion of the distance for which the franchise was granted. The franchise was granted upon consideration that the grantees would pave and keep in repair the street…

2Cited by32 opinions

  1. Clements v. T. R. Bechtel Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Campbell v. GenshleaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Alexander v. McDowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Mullally v. TownsendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Hunt v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API