Bliss v. Sneath
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Mateo County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiff upon the pleadings.
The action is for rent alleged to be due upon an in*44denture of lease. It is contended that the complaint does not sufficiently aver demand and nonpayment. The allegation is: “That the plaintiff has demanded the payment of said sum, but to pay the same, or any part thereof, the defendant refused, and still refuses.” A general demurrer was interposed, which apparently was never passed upon, but was waived by answering. The objection not having been taken by special demurrer, the pleading must now be held sufficient.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Grant v. SheerinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bliss v. SneathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Whittier v. VisscherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Larkin v. MullenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Deegan Ex Rel. Neligh v. DeeganNevada Supreme Court · 1894
- Marshall v. WentzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.