Legal Opinion

Harnish v. Bramer

California Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1886No. 11289PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

This is an action for a decree enjoining the defendants from enforcing against the plaintiffs a judgment obtained in a Justice’s Court in and for Alisal township, county of Monterey, in favor of defendant J. J. Conner, and against said plaintiffs.

A demurrer was interposed to the complaint herein, on the ground that the same did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendants.

2. That said complaint does not state íacts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendants M. L. Dexter and George W. Roadhouse, etc.

3. That there is a…

2Cited by28 opinions

  1. Continental Gin Co. v. De BordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. B & P DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. City of SaratogaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Collins v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Griffin v. CulpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Mullally v. TownsendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API