Legal Opinion

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Nicholson

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1989No. S-2303PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

David and Noreen Nicholson sued State Farm Fire & Casualty Company for unreasonably and willfully breaching its duty to act in good faith. The Nicholsons alleged that State Farm did not promptly settle a claim under their homeowner’s policy. The jury returned a special verdict in favor of the Nicholsons, awarding $105,700 in compensatory damages and $7,500 in punitive damages. On appeal, we address whether the breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in “first-party” insurance cases is a tort, thereby possibly justifying an award of punitive damages,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Arnold v. National County Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Universe Life Insurance v. GilesTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Erie Insurance v. Hickman Ex Rel. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Toy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Best Place, Inc. v. Penn America Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  5. McCullough v. Golden Rule Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1990

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API