Legal Opinion

Ridgewood Homeowners Ass'n v. Mignacca

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 14, 2003No. 2001-289-M.PPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEDERBERG, Justice.

Can David and Kathy Mignacca (Mig-naccas), two of the defendants in this case, keep their miniature horse on their residential property in the Ridgewood Estates subdivision in the City of Cranston? We answer in the negative. The Ridgewood Homeowners Association and certain members of the association individually (collectively, the association or plaintiffs) sought to prevent the Mignaccas from keeping the horse on their property. The defendant Zoning Board of Review of Cranston granted a zoning variance that allowed the horse, even though the Mig-naccas did not own…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Munroe v. Town of East GreenwichSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
  2. Snow v. Van DamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Cranston Print Works Co. v. City of CranstonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  4. Wallace v. St. ClairWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. International Depository, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cullen v. TariniSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  2. Martellini v. Little Angels Day Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  3. Chariho Regional School District v. GistSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2014
  4. Ashley v. KehewSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
  5. Pine Tree Neighborhood Assn. v. MosesNebraska Supreme Court · 2023

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API