Legal Opinion

Grangers' Business Ass'n v. Clark

California Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1890No. 12677PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Gibson, C.

Defendant appeals from a judgment and order denying a new trial in an action to foreclose a mortgage on real estate.

The defendant, on the 19th of March, 1880, being indebted to the plaintiff corporation in the sum of $5,135, for money loaned to and expended for him, gave to *203plaintiff his note for that amount, payable one day after date, bearing interest at the rate of one per cent per month from date, payable quarterly, and if not so paid, to be compounded quarterly. To secure this note he executed and delivered to' plaintiff, on the same date with that of the note, two mortgages,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mascarel v. RaffourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Curtiss v. SpragueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Sterling v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Pacific Improvement Co. v. MaxwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  5. White v. AllattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API