White v. Allatt
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Gibson, C.
This action was brought to foreclose a mortgage. The demurrer to the complaint was overruled, and upon defendants’ failure to answer, judgment was rendered against them. From that judgment they bring this appeal, and claim, — 1. That the demurrer should have been sustained, upon the grounds that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and that it is ambiguous and uncertain; and 2. That the judgment is not sustained by the pleadings.
1. It is urged that the facts are insufficient, for the reason that the plaintiff sues as trustee for seven…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kraner v. HalseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Rapp v. Spring Valley Gold Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
- Monroe v. FohlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Carriere v. MinturnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
- Grangers' Business Ass'n v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by9 opinions
- Prescott v. GradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Huber v. ShedoudyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Greenebaum v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- William Wilson Co. v. TrainorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Orange Growers' Bank v. DuncanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.