Pacific Improvement Co. v. Maxwell
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. W. Dorsey, W. E. Cashman, and R. M. F. Soto, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
In this action the plaintiff sued to recover from the defendant upon the latter’s promissory note executed to the plaintiff in the sum of $15,452.34 on March 19, 1907, and payable one day after date. The plaintiff’s complaint, iff addition to counting upon the note, alleged and relied upon the defendant’s two indorsements of the note made and dated respectively on January 31, 1901, and Janu ary 23, 1909, whereby he acknowledged the existence of the indebtedness evidenced by the note, and promised and agreed to pay the principal and all interest accrued and to accrue thereon according to its…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Savings & Loan Society v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Peck v. NoeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Curtiss v. SpragueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Bigelow v. DoolittleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Mitchell v. TowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Taylor v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Cullinan v. McColganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Wine Packing Corp. of Cal. v. VossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.