Legal Opinion

Mascarel v. Raffour

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1876No. 4907PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, First Judicial District, County of Santa Barbara. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court:

The action is to foreclose three mortgages, two of which are upon the same parcel of land and none other, while the third is also upon that parcel and an adjoining parcel. The decree forecloses the three mortgages upon the first parcel; but omits to foreclose the third mortgage on tho second parcel; and orders a personal judgment against the mortgagor for the deficiency, if there be one. The mortgagor appeals, and makes the point that under section 726 of the Code of Civil Procedure there can be no personal judgment against the defendant for the deficiency until the mortgage…

2Cited by28 opinions

  1. Bull v. CoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Barbieri v. RamelliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hall v. ArnottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Lavenson v. Standard Soap Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Commercial Bank v. KershnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API