Legal Opinion
Jares v. Ullrich
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided June 25, 2003No. 02-3100PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NETTESHEIM, EJ.
¶ 1. By declaratory judgment, the trial court ruled that Chubb Indemnity Insurance Company (Chubb) did not have a duty to defend its insureds, Feter E Ullrich and Cari Ullrich, against the negligent misrepresentation allegations set out in a complaint filed by Joseph J. Jares, III and Susan M. Jares. The Jareses' complaint alleged that a residence they purchased from the Ullrichs was infested with raccoons, other animals, and animal debris, and that the Ullrichs had negligently failed to disclose the condition. The trial court determined that Chubb did not have a duty to defend…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smith v. KatzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Olsen v. MooreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Welter v. SingerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
- Qualman v. BruckmoserCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- Bay Breeze Condominium Ass'n v. Norco Windows, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Everson v. LorenzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Boggs v. Great Northern InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2009
- Debraska v. Quad Graphics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
- Genesis Ins. v. BRE PropertiesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Madison Teachers, Inc. v. Wisconsin Education Ass'n CouncilCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.