Legal Opinion

Olsen v. Moore

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1972No. 119-123PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

Two issues are raised on this appeal:

1. Was the impact between the Moore automobile and the Rauwald automobile a separate “occurrence” from the impact between the Moore and Janikowski autos within the terms of the policy of insurance?

2. As a matter of law, was Thomas Moore acting within the scope of his employment at the time of this incident?

1. One v. two “occurrences.” The contract of insurance issued by Ba,dger State Mutual Casualty Company provided the following limits of liability in its declarations :

“Premiums Limits of Liability Coverages

$22.50 ($10,000.00 each person Bodily injury…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Truck Insurance Exchange v. RohdeWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Hyer v. Inter-Insurance Exchange of the Automobile ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Caygill v. IpsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. James v. Tobin-Sutton Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Leatherman v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. APPALACHIAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  2. Donegal Mutual Insurance v. BaumhammersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Folz v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  4. School District No. 1 v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. American Motorists Insurance v. Trane Co.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1982

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API