Legal Opinion
Smith v. Katz
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 22, 1999No. 96-1998PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavid T. Prosser, J.
¶ 1. This case is before the court because we granted Philip A. Giuffre's (Giuffre) motion for reconsideration of our decision in Smith v. Katz, 218 Wis. 2d 442, 578 N.W.2d 202 (1998). In the earlier decision, we affirmed an unpublished decision of the court of appeals 1 on grounds that Giuffre's insurance policy in the record did not cover the period in which alleged property damage occurred. When the record was amended to include a policy covering a later period, we granted Giuffre's motion for reconsideration.
¶ 2. The ultimate issue before the court is whether West Bend Mutual Insurance…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Elliott v. DonahueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- SL Industries, Inc. v. American Motorists InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- State Farm Lloyds v. KesslerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Sheets v. Brethren Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- ESTATE OF SUSTACHE v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
- Wisconsin Label Corp. v. Northbrook Property & Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Bradley Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. LangridgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Water Well Solutions Service Group Inc. v. Consolidated Insurance CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.