Legal Opinion

Mumford v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 23, 1932No. 15108PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— The offense is seduction; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The prosecutrix gave testimony embodying the elements of the offense as defined by statute, article 505, P. C., 1925. For corroboration the state relied upon the father and mother of the prosecutrix, each of whom detailed circumstances which, if believed to be true by the jury, would have been sufficient to comply with the statute demanding corroboration. In the Code of Criminal Procedure (1925) is found article 709, which reads as follows:

“In prosecutions for seduction, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Slaughter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Woolley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
  3. Brewer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Gainer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. De La Cerda v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API