Legal Opinion

Gainer v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 15, 1921No. 6326PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for the offense of seduction; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of six years.

The prosecutrix testified to her seduction by the appellant. The law, it is true, requires corroboration to both the act of intercourse and the promise of marriage, but without detailing them, we express the view that the corroborating evidence in the instant case was not insufficient as a matter of law. Slaughter v. State, 86 Texas Crim. Rep., 527, 218 S. W. Rep., 767; Nash v. State, 61 Texas Crim. Rep., 287; Wright v. State, 31 Texas Crim. Rep.,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Alexander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1892
  2. Nash v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Slaughter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Henson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cottrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Henry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Howle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Mumford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Simms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API