Ford v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
CALHOUN, Judge.
The offense is seduction; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.
The testimony of the prosecutrix was in substance as follows: She and the appellant became engaged to be married about two or three weeks prior to the act of intercourse; that she consented to intercourse with the appellant solely and alone upon the promise of marriage made to her at the time by the appellant; that the act took place at night in the back seat of an automobile. She testified that subsequent to that time she had had numerous acts of intercourse with the appellant,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Fine v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
- Wilson, Alias Garner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
- Simmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Mumford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934