Legal Opinion

De La Cerda v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 14, 1944No. 22904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a seduction case; thez punishment, two years in the state penitentiary.

A statement of the facts is not deemed called for.

In cases of this character, the prosecutrix is an accomplice and must be corroborated. Art. 709, C. C. P. The corroboration must extend to both" the promise of marriage and the act of sexual intercourse. Mumford v. State, 120 Tex. Cr. R. 566, 47 S. W. (2d) 832; Kennedy v. State, 104 Tex. Cr. R. 152, 282 S. W. 813; Brewer v. State, 93 Tex. Cr. R. 213, 246 S. W. 663; Slaughter v. State, 86 Tex. Cr. R. 527, 218 S. W. 767.

In the instant case, the charge…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Slaughter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Brewer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Kennedy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Mumford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fortenberry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Holladay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Holladay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API