Slaughter v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Judge.
—The conviction is for seduction, and the principal question requiring consideration is the correctness of the court’s action in refusing, in response to appellant’s request, to amend his charge on the subject of corroboration of the testimony of the woman charged to have been seduced.
Our statute declares: “If any person by promise to marry shall seduce an unmarried female under the age of twenty-five years, and shall have carnal knowledge of such female, he shall be punished,” etc. “The term ‘seduction’ is used in tne sense in which it is commonly undertood.” P. C., Arts.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Alexander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1892
- Nash v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- State v. TimmensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
- Murphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Ferguson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1894
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Holladay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Brewer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Gainer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- McDaniel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.