Legal Opinion

Ideal Toy Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 7, 1977No. C.D. 4688; Court Nos. 71-6-00211, etcPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Landis, Judge:

These consolidated actions 1 involve the question of whether an inflatable article described on the invoices as “inflatable baby tender chair” or “Ideal’s Baby-Me Play Float” was properly classified by customs officials as a toy, dutiable under TSUS item 737.90 at various rates depending on the date of entry,2 or should be classified as plaintiff claims, as an article of the class or kind properly classifiable under the tariff provision for pneumatic mattresses and other inflatable articles, not specially provided for, under TSUS item 790.39, also at various rates.3

The imported…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The United States v. New York Merchandise Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. Wilson's Customs Clearance, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. United States v. Globe Overseas Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. Davis Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  5. Davis Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ero Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
  2. Associated Consumers v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  3. In Zone Brands, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
  4. Infantino, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
  5. Springs Creative Prods. Grp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API