Lamont v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge
Merchandise described in the invoices as stearic acid was assessed for duty by the collector at the port of New York at 25 per centum ad valorem under the provision for “all other acids and acid anhydrides not specially provided for,” contained in paragraph 1 of the Tariff Act of 1922, which reads as follows:
Pak. 1. Acids and acid anhydrides: Acetic acid containing by weight not more than 65 per centum of acetic acid, three-fourths of 1 cent per pound; containing by weight more than 65 per centum, 2 cents per pound; acetic anhydride, 5 cents per pound; boric acid, 1J4 cents per pound;…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The MargaretSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Smillie v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- La Manna v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- United States v. Globe Overseas Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Watson v. York Metal & Alloys Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kraft Phenix Cheese Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
- United States v. Fung Chong Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- Malmar Paper Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
- American Mail Line, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
- Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.