Legal Opinion

Netherland v. Mead Corp.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice De Haven

delivered tbe opinion of tbe C'onrt.

Tbis is a compensation case brongbt nnder tbe Workmen’s Compensation Act of Tennessee. It is averred that tbe accidental injuries complained of were sustained ‘‘ on tbe --day of May, 1933,” tbe exact date, as shown in tbe proof, was May 23, 1933. Suit was brought on April 30, 1935. Defendant, among other defenses, relied on section 6874 of tbe Code, which is as follows:

“Tbe right to compensation under tbis chapter shall be forever barred, unless within one year after tbe accident resulting in injury or death occurred tbe notice required by tbe preceding…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bodne v. AustinTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Albert v. ShermanTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Bodne v. AustinTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Hudson v. ShouldersTennessee Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hall v. De SaussureCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956
  2. Pittman v. City Stores, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Travelers Insurance v. JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Bradford v. Dixie Mercerizing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Patterson v. Bessemer Coal, Iron & Land Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API