Legal Opinion

Bodne v. Austin

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1928PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swiggart

This appeal in error is by the plaintiff from the action of the circuit court in sustaining a demurrer to both counts of plaintiff’s declaration, and thereby holding that the action stated in each count is barred by the statute of limitations of one year, section 4469 of Shannon’s Code (Code of 1858, section 2772).

The first count of the declaration avers that the plaintiff accompanied his wife, Mrs. Mollie Bodne, to the office of the defendant, and retained and employed defendant to extract his wife’s teeth, and to make and fit a set of false teeth; that pursuant to the contract of employment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Whaley v. CatlettTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  2. State ex rel. Cardin v. McClellanTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. RoddyTennessee Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Flanagan v. Mount Eden General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Teeters v. CurreyTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Billings v. Sisters of Mercy of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Wyler v. TripiOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Roach v. Edge (In Re Edge)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1986

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API