Legal Opinion

Albert v. Sherman

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1934PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Green

This is a suit to recover damages for negligence with respect to the performance of a dental operation. It was dismissed by the trial judge on demurrer upon the ground that it was barred by section 8595 of the Code providing that actions for injuries to the person must be commenced "within one year after cause of action accrued.”

The suit was brought February 15, 1933. The substance of the declaration is that the defendant is a practicing dentist in Memphis, and was employed by the plaintiff on October 10, 1930, to extract a tooth, and to render the professional services incident to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hahn v. ClaybrookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
  2. Bodne v. AustinTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Capucci v. BaroneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. State ex rel. Cardin v. McClellanTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Ogg v. RobbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Norman Redwing v. Catholic Bishop for the Diocese of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Nardone v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  4. Teeters v. CurreyTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
  5. McCroskey v. Bryant Air Conditioning CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1975

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API