Legal Opinion

Hall v. De Saussure

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided June 21, 1956PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBejach, J.

This cause involves a suit by William Gr. Hall, deceased, which has been revived in the name of his widow and executrix, Mrs. Janice C. Hall, against Dr. Richard L. DeSaussure, a neuro-surgeon, for damages for performing an operation upon the spine of William Gr. Hall, deceased, which defendant, Dr. DeSaus-sure, had not been authorized to perform, and which it is claimed that he expressly agreed not to perform. The main question involved in the cause, as same is presented in this court, is whether or not the suit is barred by the statutes of limitation of one year. There is one other question…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. De Haan v. WinterMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Wildman Mfg. Co. v. Davenport Hosiery MillsTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Bates v. PrebleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Hotelling v. WaltherOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Stetson v. FrenchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Shadrick v. CokerTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Benton v. SnyderTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Vance v. SchulderTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  4. PNC Multifamily Capital Institutional Fund XXVI Limited Partnership v. Bluff City Community Development CorporationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012
  5. Stanbury v. BacardiTennessee Supreme Court · 1997

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API