Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Shoulders

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1932PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

The trial Judge sustained a demurrer invoking the '-one year statute of limitations to the declaration charging mal-practiee. Hudson alleges employment of defendants and their negligent use of the X-ray, first in May, 1928, again in August, 1928, and at other later, dates, and that following the August treatment he discovered redness and inflammation of the skin, apparent injury; that he called defendants’ attention thereto, and that they, knowing otherwise, in the exercise of professional skill which plaintiff did not possess, falsely and fraudulently represented to him that no ill-effects…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hahn v. ClaybrookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
  2. Bodne v. AustinTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Ogg v. RobbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Pashley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Vance v. SchulderTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Linda Holt v. John GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  4. Adams v. IsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952
  5. Albert v. ShermanTennessee Supreme Court · 1934

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API