Legal Opinion
Fruns v. Albertsworth
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 25, 1945No. Civ. Nos. 12911, 12893PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
Two appeals have been consolidated for hearing, one taken from a judgment following an order sustaining a demurrer to the second amended complaint without leave to amend (No. 12911), the other from an order dissolving an attachment in the same cause (No. 12893).
The first cause of action is one on a written contract dated October 18, 1943, but the place of execution is left in confusion because of the record in the attachment proceedings, which will hereafter be noted. On the face of the agreement it is stated that it was executed at Nogales, Arizona. In the original complaint which appears in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Orloff v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Hays v. TempleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Harris v. KesslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Rose v. AmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Duncan v. NowellArizona Supreme Court · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shive v. BarrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Spencer v. Crocker First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Albertsworth v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Phillips v. Reserve Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Wm. E. Doud & Co. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967