Legal Opinion
Wm. E. Doud & Co. v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 30, 1967No. Civ. 30810PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOX, J. *
This is an action to recover a real estate commission. Defendants’ demurrer was sustained to counts II, III and IV of the second amended complaint without leave to amend. Plaintiffs 2 have appealed from the ensuing' judgment of dismissal.
In the second cause of action it is alleged that Smith and Siegel were the owners of a large tract of unimproved land in Ventura County suitable for subdivision. They indicated to plaintiffs their desire to sell this property, but refused to give plaintiffs a general brokers listing, stating that the price and terms at which they would sell the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brant v. California Dairies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Augustine v. TruccoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Beazell v. SchraderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Imbach v. SchultzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Jamison v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Rader Co. v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Louisville Title Insurance v. Surety Title & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Weiss v. Brentwood Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Armco Inc. v. Glenfed Financial Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.