Legal Opinion

Rose v. Ames

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 1942No. Civ. 13541PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from (1) a judgment in favor of defendants after the trial court sustained a demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint without leave to amend in an action to recover damages for breach of an alleged contract, and (2) an order denying plaintiff’s motion for permission to file an amended complaint. The complaint contained the following allegations in substance:

Count I

Count I is a common count for money had and received.

Count II

I

Prior to the institution of the present action Maurice Rose filed a certificate with the county clerk of Los Angeles County, showing that he was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hays v. TempleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Harris v. HirschfeldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Agnew v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Neal v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Miller v. McLaglenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Leoni v. DelanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Lambert v. Southern Counties Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1959

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API