Legal Opinion
Albertsworth v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 13, 1948No. Civ. No. 13581PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
The principal question here is whether the liability of sureties on an attachment bond continues in whole or in part after the filing of a supersedeas bond on appeal.
On July 10,1944, one Fruns commenced suit in the Superior Court of Santa Clara County against the Albertsworths (plaintiffs herein). That a writ of attachment might issue, defendant indemnity company filed an undertaking in the amount of $2,500, in the usual form, promising that if the attachment was discharged or the defendants therein recovered judgment, defendant indemnity company would pay all costs that might be awarded and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Samuels v. SingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Mason v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Soule v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Heine v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Primm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Scott, Blake & Wynne v. Summit Ridge Estates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Graddon v. KnightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Gray v. American Surety Co. of New YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Henderson v. DrakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Ideal Heating Corp. v. Royal Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.