Phillips v. Reserve Life Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
The trial court sustained defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s second amended complaint without leave to amend and ordered a dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff appealed. A demurrer to the second amended complaint by a codefendant, William J. Coffman, was overruled.
This amended complaint alleges as a first cause of action, in substance, that about June 1, 1952, defendant Reserve Life Insurance Company (hereinafter referred to as the company) issued a policy of insurance in the sum of $10,000 on the life of Hyde Phillips (a copy of the policy is attached to the complaint); that the premiums…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Farnum v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Washer v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Richards v. Travelers Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Orloff v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Arnold v. American Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Farr v. BramblettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Skopp v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Scott v. Federal Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Silva v. National American Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Walker v. Home Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.